Key takeaways:
This article outlines valuation tools—fairness opinions, purchase price allocations, and stock compensation valuations—that support compliance and risk mitigation in mergers and acquisitions.
Acquiring a new company or selling your existing one can be an exciting journey. It offers you opportunities for long-term growth or shareholder liquidity. However, as a buyer or seller, you must navigate unique responsibilities to minimize litigation risks and ensure accounting compliance, whether you’re managing a public or private company. Valuation tools, including fairness opinions, purchase price allocations (PPAs), and equity compensation valuations, are essential for ensuring compliance and reducing risks throughout the transaction process.
For a deeper look at how fairness opinions support diligence and legal risk mitigation in deals, see Fairness Opinions in M&A: Strategic Value and Legal Risk Mitigation.
Insights reflect extensive valuation practice experience supporting financial reporting, tax, and litigation matters across industries.
Fairness opinions are independent evaluations performed by third-party appraisers to assess whether the transaction price is fair. These opinions help you and your board meet fiduciary responsibilities by providing expert insights to support informed decisions.
When you obtain a fairness opinion, you can demonstrate due diligence and protect yourself against shareholder lawsuits. The purpose of fairness opinions differs between public and private companies, reflecting varying stakeholder needs and regulatory requirements.
Let’s explore how they can help you mitigate risks in these contexts.
Public-company fairness opinions address shareholder approval, rollover equity, competing offers, and hostile bids by applying rigorous reporting standards and disclosure practices.
If you manage a public company, you face additional responsibilities due to your diverse shareholder base and strict reporting requirements under FASB and SEC guidelines. Here’s how fairness opinions help you manage these challenges:
Fairness opinions are typically obtained after final negotiations but before your board makes recommendations to shareholders. This ensures every aspect of the transaction is analyzed thoroughly.
As the leader of a private company, you may face unique risks where fairness opinions can provide critical support. In private-company deals, fairness opinions help manage insider-led buyouts and limited-advisor scenarios by identifying and mitigating conflicts of interest.
To understand when and why privately held companies should consider engaging a fairness opinion, check out Why Get a Fairness Opinion for a Privately Held Company.
Obtaining a fairness opinion during these transactions safeguards your interests and provides a defensible basis for your decisions.
A purchase price allocation (PPA) divides the price you pay (or receive) for a company among its tangible and intangible assets. The remaining value is recorded as goodwill.
PPAs should be prepared shortly after the close date to prevent audit risk.
Private companies can simplify their PPAs by electing ASU 2014-18, which allows customer-related and non-compete assets to be absorbed into goodwill. Unaudited companies can often avoid a PPA for financial reporting altogether.
Guidance aligns with established accounting frameworks and practical allocation experience used in post-close financial reporting and tax compliance.
In some transactions, the classification of equity payments may differ from your intent. For instance, if equity issued to sellers depends on their continued employment, it may be classified as stock compensation under ASC-718 rather than as part of the purchase price.
Here’s what you need to know:
By ensuring compliance with ASC-718, you avoid audit risks and maintain transparency for stakeholders.
Recommendations reflect recurring engagement with ASC-718 valuation and reporting issues encountered in transactional settings.
If you’re involved in a SPAC transaction, fairness opinions can help mitigate risks. While the SEC recently declined to mandate fairness opinions for de-SPAC transactions, obtaining one remains a best practice to protect against shareholder disputes.
The prudent use of fairness opinions in SPAC contexts is supported by precedent in transaction practice and awareness of evolving regulatory viewpoints.
Q: What is a fairness opinion and when should a company obtain one?
A: A fairness opinion is an independent third-party assessment that evaluates whether a proposed transaction price is fair to shareholders from a financial perspective. Companies commonly obtain fairness opinions during transactions that require board recommendations, shareholder approval, or when conflicts of interest or complex consideration create litigation or disclosure risk.
Q: How do fairness opinions differ for public versus private companies?
A: For public companies, fairness opinions often address a broader shareholder base and stricter disclosure and reporting standards, focusing on issues like shareholder approval and rollover equity. In private companies, the emphasis is frequently on mitigating conflicts of interest in insider-led transactions and providing independent evidence where external advisory resources are limited.
Q: When must a purchase price allocation (PPA) be prepared and what does it include?
A: A PPA should be prepared shortly after the close date to allocate the transaction price among tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, and residual goodwill, and to avoid audit or tax reporting issues. The allocation supports financial statement presentation, tax filings such as Form 8594, and subsequent impairment testing and disclosure obligations.
Q: How can ASC-718 change the accounting treatment of equity issued to sellers?
A: ASC-718 requires stock-based compensation accounting when equity issued to sellers is contingent on future service or employment, which reclassifies such consideration from purchase price to compensation expense. That reclassification triggers a separate valuation process, affects reported earnings, and requires third-party appraisal in many cases to determine fair value.
Q: Are fairness opinions recommended for SPAC de-SPAC transactions?
A: Although the SEC has declined to mandate fairness opinions for de-SPAC transactions, obtaining one remains a recommended best practice to provide independent valuation support and reduce shareholder dispute risk. A fairness opinion can clarify valuation assumptions and document due diligence in structurally complex transactions.
***
Whether you’re buying or selling, your transaction’s success depends on careful planning and execution. Tools like fairness opinions, purchase price allocations, and stock compensation valuations are essential to ensure compliance and minimize risks. By addressing these factors, you can move forward with confidence and achieve the best possible outcomes for your company and its stakeholders.
Paul Vogt
Paul Vogt is a Managing Director at PCE and leads the firm’s valuation practice from its Atlanta office. With over 20 years of experience, he specializes in business valuations for financial reporting, tax planning, litigation support, and corporate strategy across a wide range of industries.