Industry Reports

Aerospace & Government | Q4 2025 | PCE Investment Bankers

Written by David Jasmund | Jan 14, 2026 3:53:13 PM

Executive Summary

Valuation appetite remained resilient into Q4 2025. The last twelve months saw 124 transactions (28 in Q4) with median multiples of 18.16× TEV/EBITDA and 3.38× TEV/Revenue, reflecting continued competition for IP-rich, defense-electronics, mission software, and sustainment-oriented assets.

Commercial aerospace demand remained supported by resilient international travel and OEM production normalization, while defense visibility continued to benefit from sustained modernization priorities across C5ISR, munitions, ISR, and space resilience amid elevated geopolitical risk.¹ ³ ⁶

Commercial air activity was reflected primarily through aftermarket, MRO, and proprietary components transactions, as buyers targeted pricing power, PMA exposure, and long-cycle fleet sustainment rather than new-program risk, evidenced by Boeing’s acquisition of Spirit AeroSystems (aero structures and production normalization), TransDigm’s acquisition of Simmonds Precision (proprietary components and pricing power), and AAR’s acquisition of HAECO Americas (commercial and defense MRO scale).

Policy and budget dysfunction was a defining narrative for government-exposed ADG. The U.S. experienced a federal shutdown in October 2025, reinforcing contractor concerns around award timing, funding continuity, and execution pacing.¹ ² Stopgap funding dynamics (continuing resolutions) remained a practical constraint on DoD acquisition, commonly restricting new starts, production-rate increases, and certain multi-year procurement activity, compressing award windows later in the fiscal year and creating backlog-to-revenue timing risk.² ³

Despite these constraints, elevated defense priorities and demand for fighters, munitions, ISR, and readiness-related capabilities continued to support deal momentum, particularly for assets that improve industrial-base resilience and execution certainty.¹ ³ ⁶

“Budget uncertainty and continuing resolutions have introduced timing friction, but they have not diminished buyer conviction,” said David Jasmund, Managing Director. “Strategic buyers remain highly focused on aerospace and defense platforms that enhance execution certainty under constrained funding environments.”

Market Dynamics

Deals: 28 in Q4; LTM 124 (vs. 129 a year ago).

Valuations: LTM medians of 18.16× EBITDA / 3.38× revenue, expanding versus Q4 2024.
Government funding mechanics drove sentiment more than pure end-demand. Continuing resolutions and shutdown risk delayed RFPs, awards, and program starts, increasing administrative burden and uncertainty around hiring, subcontracting, and delivery schedules—particularly for services-heavy and program-start-dependent contractors.

Strategics continued to prioritize vertical integration (sensors, avionics, propulsion, thermal/structural subsystems) and capabilities that improve throughput and compliance under uncertain funding; financial sponsors favored O&M-weighted and task-order-visible platforms, underwriting more conservatively for award-timing risk.¹ ² ³ ⁶

Buyer Landscape

Strategic Acquirers: 104 of 124 LTM deals (83.9%), plus 4 other/undisclosed (3.2%) — activity concentrated in defense electronics, aerospace services, avionics, and mission-critical manufacturing.

Financial Buyers: 16 of 124 LTM deals (12.9%) — focus on platform carve-outs, precision manufacturing, avionics/MRO, and software-enabled defense services with durable cash flow and recompete visibility.

 

Industry Comparison

ADG represented approximately 0.9% of overall M&A volume in both Q4 2025 and Q4 2025 LTM, consistent with historical ranges. Despite modest volume share, valuation medians continued to outpace broader industrial cohorts, supported by multi-year defense priorities, backlog visibility, and resilient aftermarket exposure.

However, near-term execution remained dominated by appropriations mechanics, with audits noting CR-related constraints on new starts, production-rate increases, and funding ramps, which can slow modernization throughput even when strategic demand is strong.¹ ² ³

Geographic Expansion

Top U.S. states by seller count (Q4 2025 LTM): California (20), Florida (15), Texas (6), Washington (5), Virginia (4), New York (4), Maryland (4).

Seller activity remained concentrated in states with dense aerospace manufacturing footprints, DoD installations, and cleared-labor ecosystems, consistent with buyer preference for established defense corridors.

Notable Transactions

Largest Transactions Closed

Target Buyer Value ($mm)
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. The Boeing Company $8,588.00
Simmonds Precision Products, Inc. TransDigm Group Incorporated  $765.00
SciTec, Inc. Firefly Aerospace Inc. $604.00
Aero 3, Inc. VSE Corporation $350.00
HAECO Americas, LLC AAR Corp. $78.00
GuideTech, LLC Palladyne AI Corp. $46.00
KinetX Aerospace, Inc. Intuitive Machines, Inc. $30.00
Joined Alloys, LLC Trusted Aerospace Engineering Pvt. Ltd. $12.00

Other Financial Buyer Transactions Closed

Target Buyer Value ($mm)
Digital Aviation Solutions Business of The Boeing Company Thoma Bravo, L.P. $10,550.00

Other Strategic Buyer Transactions Closed

Target Buyer Value ($mm)
Innovative Signal Analysis, Inc. HawkEye 360, Inc. n/a
GlobalSim, Inc. CM Labs Simulations Inc. n/a
Aerospace Control Products, Inc. Advanced Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. n/a
H.E.R.O.S., Inc. Precision Aviation Group, Inc. n/a
PCX Aerosystems Enfield, LLC Applied Aerospace Structures, Corp. n/a
QED Systems, LLC Peerless Technologies Corporation n/a
JGA Space & Defense Torque Capital Group LLC n/a

Source S&P Capital IQ as of 1/2/2026 and PCE Proprietary Data

Emerging Trends

Key trends shaping Aerospace, Defense & Government M&A:

  1. Federal Budget Dysfunction & Award Timing Risk
    Shutdown events and CR reliance delay awards and compress procurement timelines, increasing execution uncertainty for contractors.1 2
  2. CR “New Start” & Production Constraints
    Stopgap funding restricts new programs, production-rate increases, and some multi-year procurements, impacting ramp schedules and revenue timing.2
  3. Sustainment & O&M Bias
    Buyers favor revenue streams that persist more consistently through funding turbulence versus new-start programs.3
  4. Industrial-Base Resilience Premium
    Assets that enhance domestic capacity, supply security, and cleared labor availability command strategic value.1 3
  5. Platform Carve-Out Activity
    Large OEM and prime divestitures remain a key source of scale assets for sponsors and strategics executing platform-plus-bolt-on strategies.1 3

Outlook for Next Quarter

Opportunities: Defense priorities remain supportive for fighters, munitions, ISR, and readiness-related capabilities, with buyers continuing to pay for execution certainty in constrained labor and supply environments.¹ ³

Risks: Federal appropriations uncertainty (CR extensions / shutdown recurrence) may delay awards and constrain funding rates, while broader policy uncertainty can extend diligence and closing timelines.² ⁹

Expected Activity: Continued interest in assets that mitigate government execution risk, including cleared-talent platforms, compliant manufacturing capacity, and mission-critical software/electronics with sticky sustainment budgets into 2026.¹ ³

PCE Transactions

 

Contact Us

David Jasmund
Orlando Office
407-621-2111 |
Email me now

READ MORE →

Michael Rosendahl
New York Office
201-444-6280 |
Email me now

READ MORE →

Eric Zaleski
Chicago Office
847-239-2466 |
Email me now

READ MORE →

 

Data Assumptions

This report represents transaction activity as mergers & acquisitions, consolidations, restructurings and spin-offs. Targets are defined as U.S. Based companies with either foreign or U.S. based buyers. Transaction information provided is based on closed dates only.

Glossary

EBIT - Earnings Before Interest and Taxes
EBITDA - Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization
LTM - Last Twelve Months
TEV - Total Enterprise Value

Sources:

  1. Deloitte. “Mid-Year 2025 Aerospace & Defense Outlook,” July 2025.
  2. Congressional Research Service. “Overview of Continuing Appropriations for FY2025,” Oct 2024.
  3. U.S. Department of Defense Office of Inspector General. “Audit of the Impact of Continuing Resolutions on DoD Acquisition Programs,” July 2025.
  4. Bloomberg Government. “What a Continuing Resolution Means for Federal Contractors…,” July 2025.
  5. Defense One. “Defense tech companies will weather the shutdown…,” Nov 2025.
  6. S&P Global Ratings. “Industry Credit Outlook 2025 and Mid-Year Updates,” Aug 2025.
  7. Reuters / Washington Post / TIME reporting on October 2025 shutdown impacts.
  8. Fitch Ratings. “Global Aerospace & Defence Outlook 2025,” Aug 2025.
  9. PwC. “Deals Pulse: Policy Uncertainty and Deal Pacing,” 2025.
  10. Capital IQ. “PCE Transaction Data (Accessed Jan 2, 2026): Deal Counts, Buyer Mix, State Counts, Values, and Comparison Tables.”